Sep 25 2009

Progress report on Freedom to Be

But first… GO THE MIGHTY EELS! Woohoo! It’s so exciting to finally have the blue and gold back where it belongs – near the top! However, you have caused me a dilemma, my mighty friends – you see, I’m at a science fiction convention next weekend, with lots to do, and am now torn as to how to find time to watch the grand final… Don’t worry, I’ll find a way.

Now, onto the novel (which now has an ISBN and everything – contract arrived yesterday, more woohoo). I twittered on Wednesday that I’d just finished re-reading the book, and that I’d enjoyed it. I believe I even said I thought I was good at this writerly stuff. Ah, words that come back to bite us…

Thursday morning, I sat down to plot the book against a couple of plot outlines that I have. The first was one Cat Sparks showed me on screenplay structure, and I was pleased that the book generally matched that. I’m wondering if it slows down a bit too much around the seventy-five percent mark, but I’ll wait to hear the beta readers views on that. The second plot outline is from The Art of Romance Writing by Valerie Parv, and deals more exclusively with the plot arcs of romances. I wasn’t surprised to find FTB matched this pretty well for the first half, but then deviated away from it. Generally, these books are tending more towards the romance side of things initially, before the fantasy element takes over.

However, doing both those exercises focussed me on a couple of minor plot issues. I managed to consider and sort through the motivations of two minor characters, and thus was able to make scenes with them clearer and work better and their plot lines to stand up. However, a third one is causing me angst. There’s a couple, Connie and Nick, who’s main task in the story was to make Stephen (the hero) look good, namely by constantly saving her and restraining from killing him. However, Connie is a whiny little shit, and Nick a dickhead thug, and none of the scenes involving them were really working. So I had a bit of a think about it, and decided to reverse the roles – put Connie in as the femme fatale, and Nick as her unknowing dupe. I quite liked the idea, and so started to rework a few scenes. Except I then realised that doing that undid an entire sequence of events that impacted on the romance.

Bummer.

So, now I need to consider if I need Connie and Nick at all, or whether they’re just filling and not really achieving anything. Do I need to make Stephen look good in this way? My concern, when I introduced Connie and Nick, was that Stephen was coming across as a bit too intense and obsessive and that I needed to soften him up a bit to make him more a romantic lead. But then, reading through the book, I think that I’ve already started that in a couple of other ways, and if I make him live less in his head initially and particularly stop the angsting over his past, he’ll soften up. But then, if I remove Connie and Nick, I’ve got to come up with a new way of moving the romance between Stephen and Ione along after the initial coming together.

You know, the more I write this, the more I realise that Connie and Nick do have to go. They were an easy solution to the problem of Stephen, and while sometimes easy is also the right solution, in this case it isn’t. So, back to the drawing board on the first part of the book.

Sep 22 2009

Some miscellaneous stuff

First, I’ve got a post about some of the things I wish I’d known before I sold the trilogy on the Ripping Ozzing Reads blog. You can find it here http://ripping-ozzie-reads.blogspot.com/2009/09/five-things-i-wish-i-knew-before-i-got.html 

Second, was it just me or were the Emmys a bit of a fizzer? Not because of Neil Patrick Harris – he is all things awesome and I will never heard a word against him – but it seems there was a concerted lack of energy around the room. Almost as if those attending were too cool for school. I was left with a decided feeling of ‘meh’, which is a travesty considering how much I LOVE award shows. Although I did like the idea of doing the awards in genre categories.

Third, you have got to start following Maureen Johnson’s reader’s guide to The Lost Symbol http://maureenjohnson.blogspot.com/2009/09/lost-symbol-readers-guide-part-one.html Tres, tres, tres funny. And a little concerning – what if my book is such dross that someone can do this to me? Although, if it comes with Dan Brown’s paycheck, go for it :) Hmm, you know, having written it down, I’ve now decided that The Lost Symbol is a pretty dumb title for a book. There’s nothing interesting in it – there’s a symbol, and it’s lost. Whoopie. Why should I care? Demons and Angels, now there’s a title – cause you know if there’s demons involved, there’s gonna be some bad-arse shit going down there. But someone lost a symbol – boo hoo. Hmmm, snark seems to be catching…

Four, things are a changing around here at Casa de Murphy. I’ve started back on the healthy eating plan that saw me lose massive kilos when I was living in Sussex Inlet, and upping the exercise quotient too, so hopefully there will be some good results from that. I’ve also started reconfiguring the whole housework thing in order for it to not become too pig sty-ie as the pressure builds and the deadlines come closer. Control, peoples. The word de jour is control.

Five, I’ve picked up Freedom to Be (that’s a better title than The Lost Symbol, right?) to start revising and polishing with the aim to have it ready for my wonderful, fantabulous beta readers by the end of October. At least, that’s the plan, but I’m expecting to get edits on Love in Control (now, that’s a good title, right?) sometime soon. And then, while I put FTB away in November and wait for responses from the betas, I’m gonna start the re-write of Chance and Reward (oh no, now I’ve got title paranoia!). December, more polishing of FTB, then more beta reading of it and re-writing of C&R, then at the retreat at January will do the final polish of FTB to have it ready to send to the publishers at the end of January. Then it’s onto focussing on the re-write and polish of C&R, while also doing edits of FTB and working on promoting LIC… Tell me again why I thought this was a good idea?

Six, go the mighty Eels! I know I don’t always talk about my love of sport, mainly cause I go in and out of the mood to actually watch it, but my heart has belonged to the Parramatta Eels since I was a little girl, and it makes me all tingly to see how well they’re going this year. Special kudos to Nathan Hindmarsh, who is a bloody legend, and to Jarryd Hayne whose turnaround from being involved in shootouts at nightclubs last year to winning the best player in the league this year has re-affirmed my faith in mankind. Friday, it’s the game of the year against the old enemy, the Bulldogs! Go boys!

Sep 15 2009

How newbies can get the help they need

There’s been a lot of discussion on the net about professional writers refusing to read new writers’ stuff. It started here with an impassioned plea by screenwriter John Olson, and then has been added to here by David Gerrold and here by John Scalzi (among a few). In fact, just Google “I will not read” and you’ll see a plethora of responses.

One question that comes up from newbies is “well, then, how are we supposed to get the help we need?” So I thought I’d share with you the things I did in order to get to the position of selling a novel.

In a nutshell, my path consisted of joining a writing group, reading and attending workshops, getting involved in small press publishing and along the way, making some wonderful friends who were prepared to beta read stories and manuscripts for me.

I started writing with an aim to be published in 2000. I had some success in placing a couple of short stories, but my aim was always novels. I finished the first novel and got some people to read it (not writers, just friends) and then based on their “Oh I love it” started to submit it. After a few polite rejections from agents, I decided that maybe I needed to look at little more carefully at what was involved in this whole writing thing.

Initially, I had two things going for me in my writing – I’ve got a natural feel for spelling and grammar (thank goodness, cause I went to primary school here in Australia in the mid to late 70s and back then, grammar was considered experimental) and I’ve always been pretty good at the worldbuilding thing. I knew there were other things, but I didn’t know what or how.

In 2002, I discovered the Canberra Speculative Fiction Guild and started getting and receiving crits of my work. And I realised the areas I needed to work on: characterisation (not too much, pretty good), plotting, and particularly I needed to learn how to revise and edit my own work.

So, I attended classes and workshops, mostly organised through local writer’s centres – Jack Dann’s workshop in Canberra in 2003 was particularly useful, because for that we did get to submit a piece of work to a master writer and it was critted not only by him but by the rest of the workshop participants. If you want advice or feedback from an established writer, this is the way to do it – several of them do workshops, so research who and where and what and be aware that you’re going to get honest feedback. I made the silly mistake of allowing my story to be critted last, at the end of an exhaustive weekend, and we were running out of time so everyone was short and brief and I was hammered. I cried for at least an hour on the way home. But I have to say, it was one of the best things that’s ever happened to me, and eventually it inspired rather than rejected me and I became a better writer because of it.

I bought books, I studied them. I knew as a teacher it was best to set myself up to focus on one thing at a time.

2003 was when I wrote the original drafts of Balance of Power, and this trilogy was also where I taught myself how to revise and edit. Based on two books – Beginnings, Middles and Endings by Nancy Kress and Getting the Words Right by Theodore A. Rees Cheney – I devised a program on how to revise the novels. Each one was written in a month (I wasn’t working back then, so 60,000 words a month – they were short novels – was easy). Then for the next three months, I went over each novel using the same plan – firstly I sat down and wrote out each scene, who was in it, what happened, what it did for the story and whether it worked or not. Then I did a character sheet for every character in the novel – stuff like what they were good at, bad at and so on. There were a couple of other things that I can’t quite remember, and then I re-wrote the book. After those three months, I then went back and did a finer edit of those books – things like just reading out the conversation to make sure it flowed, reading the entire book aloud, spell checks and so on.

2003 was also the year that I decided if I was going to make money from writing, I should freelance, so I contact local newspapers. That resulted in me getting a temporary job at the local paper filling in for sick leave or when things got busy; which turned into a part-time job there which led to me all but editing the bi-monthly Senior Lifestyle magazine; which then led to a full-time job at the free paper here in Canberra. I left journalism in January last year, but the things I learnt there about passive versus active writing, getting things clear and easily understood and being able to condense a huge story into a few words (hello, synopsis!) have well and truly stood me in good stead.

In 2003, 2004 I started to get involved in publishing, particularly slush reading. I was the slush wrangler for two CSFG anthologies (Elsewhere and Encounters), and joined the Andromeda Spaceways Collective, which publishes Andromeda Spaceways Inflight Magazine (ASIM). There’s nothing quite like having to read and judge hundreds of short stories to make clear in your mind what makes a good or bad story. In 2005, 2006, I dropped out of writing a lot to pursue an interest in editing. I edited the CSFG anthology The Outcast and Issue 25 of ASIM. Over the course of eighteen months, I worked with twenty-nine different authors, teaching myself to recognise the strengths and weaknesses of their writing while learning about my own.

In 2007, the CSFG started up a novel critting group for those of us who were wanting to move on from short stories to longer works (despite the good start, I’d had meagre success in short stories – not quite where my talents lie, although I am still forging on). Apart from Gillian Polack, who had one novel published and another in the process of being published, none of us had sold a novel. I chose to go with the first novel of the fantasy romance trilogy I’d written all those years before. The first month, we critted each other’s opening chapters, and then we took turns to present our novel and be the sole focus of the crit group for that months. I think my novel was about the fourth looked at, cause I had some work to do – in between that initial crit and when I presented it for my month, I added another 20,000 words to the book. There’s nothing like having a group of four people sit down and pull your novel to shreds to see what’s working and what’s not.

With their thoughts in my mind, I started working on the novel again in earnest. From it’s inception to the point I started submitting it, a total of ten drafts were written. I had two lots of readers go through it – fellow writers, with a range of experience, my fabulous beta readers. From everything I’d done over the years, I knew how to revise, I was stronger on characterisation and better at plotting. Finally, in November last year I started to submit it to publishers, and as we now know I sold it to HarperVoyager in July.

So, that’s how I got the feedback and help I needed to get good enough to write a story good enough to sell. They’re nearly all things anyone can do – find a writing group (or make up your own if you have to), read text books and attend workshops, get involved in publishing – without having to bug a big-name author. And becoming a professional in another writing field – journalism, copywriting, technical writer – will teach you a lot of the skills needed for fiction as well.

The most important thing, however, is to recognise there is learning to do (and it never ends), that you have to work hard to get better and in order to do this, you have to accept that at first you won’t be good at stuff and you need people to point the bad things out in order to identify and improve. That means people will say bad things about your writing. Just smile at them then jump in the car and bawl your eyes out, if you have to, but then get back to the task at hand – learning what you don’t do well in order to get better at it.

Sep 15 2009

Australian Speculative Fiction Carnival – Sept 09, Part 2

Thoughts on writing:

Justine Larbelestier talked about questions that writers ask. First, the wrong ones - http://justinelarbalestier.com/blog/2009/08/25/very-wrong-questions/ - then the right ones - http://justinelarbalestier.com/blog/2009/08/28/the-right-questions/

Fellow Canberran Tracey O’Hara celebrated the launch of her first novel this month with this post on the Deadline Dames website http://www.deadlinedames.com/?p=1571

Keri Arthur talks about the need to look after yourself http://www.deadlinedames.com/?p=1529

Over at the Science Fiction and Fantasy Novelists blog, Glenda Larke talks about what makes a writer successful? http://www.sfnovelists.com/2009/08/31/what-makes-a-successful-writer/

Jennifer Fallon talks about whether it’s possible to write too fast http://www.jenniferfallon.com.au/blog/index.cfm/2009/8/30/About-writing-too-fast and then about naming characters http://www.jenniferfallon.com.au/blog/index.cfm/2009/8/25/Whats-in-a-name

Karen Miller arose from her cave for a brief moment to fill us in on life for a professional author who’s got a LOT of projects on the go. Hope the end is in sight, Karen http://karenmiller.livejournal.com/213688.html

Sophie Masson talks about writing about magic http://writerunboxed.com/2009/08/19/a-touch-of-magic/

At the Mad Genius Club, Rowena Cory Daniells talked about women in science fiction and fantasy – the characters, that is, not the writers http://madgeniusclub.blogspot.com/2009/09/females-in-fantasy-and-sf.html, part of a developing theme on women in literature as seen via Sarah Rees Brennan http://sarahtales.livejournal.com/151335.html

Also at the club, Chris McMahon on finding time for writing http://madgeniusclub.blogspot.com/2009/09/squeezing-into-gaps.html

Still at the club, Rowena on how you know when you’re a writer http://madgeniusclub.blogspot.com/2009/08/you-know-youre-writer-when.html

Trent Jamieson shared his thoughts on writing http://syndicated.livejournal.com/trent_jamieson/115648.html

Tansy Rayner Roberts on how new motherhood and deadlines meet http://cassiphone.livejournal.com/244688.html

Karen Miller’s The Prodigal Mage took part in the Page 69 test http://page69test.blogspot.com/2009/09/prodigal-mage.html

Fascinating discussion on Alisa Krasnostein’s blog about female voice in writing http://girliejones.livejournal.com/1453039.html and then on the Bechdel Test http://girliejones.livejournal.com/1451089.html and Simon Petrie talks about it here http://punktortoise.livejournal.com/20407.html

I blogged on things that keep you going as a writer http://nicolermurphy.com/post/What-keeps-you-going-.aspx

Reading has opened for the next edition of Midnight Echo http://battersblog.blogspot.com/2009/09/midnight-echoinginginging.html

Glenda Larke on copy-edits. If this is a good news day… http://syndicated.livejournal.com/glendalarke/291146.html

Deborah Biancotti looked at the next step for writers – promotion http://deborahb.livejournal.com/307406.html

Sean Williams returned to blogging after a hiatus with some insight into what a writer does between novels http://ladnews.livejournal.com/128630.html

A must-visit blog is Ripping Ozzie Reads http://ripping-ozzie-reads.blogspot.com/, the online home of the wRiters on Retreat (ROR) group which includes names such as Marianne de Pierres, Richard Harland and Rowena Cory Daniells

Another blog you should be visiting is Call My Agent http://callmyagent.blogspot.com/

And you are coming to Conflux 6 this year, aren’t you? Right? Right? www.conflux.org.au In the meantime, find the Conflux Virtual Mini-con for this year here - http://conflux.org.au/forum/index.php?board=8.0

Sep 15 2009

Australian Speculative Fiction Carnival – Sept 09, part one

First, a plug that at this moment, the NZ Spec Fic Blogging Week is taking place. More info here http://punktortoise.livejournal.com/21577.html

And second, another plug, for Saving Aussie Books, who have been working hard to have the Government decide to not repeal parallel importation restrictions on books http://savingaussiebooks.wordpress.com/

Sad news

We say goodbye to Shiny, the YA webzine from Twelfth Planet Press http://girliejones.livejournal.com/1463645.html

Oh, the horror, the horror:

Have you been reading Rob Hood’s website Undead Backbrain? You should. It’s full of zombie and giant monster goodness. http://roberthood.net/blog/

Following on from that thought, Chuck McKenzie gives us the list we’ve been dying for – the ten best zombie novels of the past year http://chuckmck1.livejournal.com/10865.html

To see how horror gets dealt with on the ABC, click here to watch Jennifer Byrne and luminaries such as Leigh Blackmore and Wil Elliot discuss it http://www.abc.net.au/tv/firsttuesday/video/jbp/2009.htm

And here’s last month’s wrap up of Aussie horror news http://taliehelene.livejournal.com/139101.html

Electronica:

Thoughts on ereaders – Justine Larbelestier http://justinelarbalestier.com/blog/2009/08/31/electronic-readers-post-the-second/, Jonathan Strahan http://syndicated.livejournal.com/coode_street/398678.html

Juliet Marillier talks about her new website and why and how she went about the redesign http://writerunboxed.com/2009/09/03/the-evolution-of-a-new-website/

Glenda Larke talks about some good uses of the internet, and the joy that good reviews can bring http://syndicated.livejournal.com/glendalarke/292862.html

Another good use of the internet – getting to see a friend a long-way-away, in this case an interview with Kaaron Warren http://girliejones.livejournal.com/1454344.html

The internet again triumphs (after an initial hiccup), this time in helping sell books overseas http://glendalarke.blogspot.com/2009/09/how-to-order-from-australian-bookstore.html

Some authors and publishers have been posting snippets (or actual entire works) up on the web to whet our appetites – here’s one from Keri Arthur http://www.deadlinedames.com/?p=1589, and here from HarperCollins the full text of Glenda Larke’s new novel The Last Stormlord http://browseinside.harpercollins.com.au/index.aspx?isbn13=9780732289294

Fannish stuff:

Reviews on Anticipation from Matthew Farrer http://matthewfarrer.wordpress.com/2009/08/27/anticipation-part-i/, http://matthewfarrer.wordpress.com/2009/09/11/anticipation-the-panels-part-i/

Photos appeared of last month’s Continuum convention http://www.flickr.com/photos/33453925@N00/sets/72157622137180971/

The Duff and Guff races are now on to see who will join us Down-Under next year http://community.livejournal.com/aust_sf_fan_fun/

Author news:

I know this is an Australian Spec Fic Carnival, but Dave Freer is about to become an Aussie (a resident at least), so have a look at his unique idea for helping to get his much loved pets over here - http://savethedragons.nu/

Marianne de Pierres launched her alter-ego, Mariane Delacourt, and the Tara Sharp series http://mariannedelacourt.wordpress.com/ as well as the new Marianne de Pierres, YA writer http://mariannedepierres.wordpress.com/ Marianne is apparently giving Sean Williams a run for his money in the productivity stakes.

In the windup to the whole Liar cover controversy, we learn that not only has the cover been corrected, but the book should still be out in time http://justinelarbalestier.com/blog/2009/09/05/us-edition-of-liar-will-publish-on-time/

Oh, and some chick that I kinda know announced her new novel deal http://nicolermurphy.com/post/The-good-news-e28093-trilogy-sold.aspx

Miscellaneous:

Where Mr Flintart manfully takes on the great questions of the universe and is thwarted by a small boy http://flinthart.livejournal.com/88123.html

Where Margo Lanagan tries to make sense of the English furor over Tender Morsels http://readersplace.co.uk/author-spotlight/margo-lanagan/

Where Amanda Pillar speaks on the current debate on the future of vampires http://amandapillar.livejournal.com/95311.html

Where the Queen of Kitsch, Cat Sparks, brings us the glory that is William Shatner in song, and is then trumped by Jason Fischer and his Leonard Nimoy contribution http://catsparx.livejournal.com/167613.html

Where Simon Petrie releases his inner-geek boy and waxes lyrical about Sean Williams http://punktortoise.livejournal.com/21138.html

Where Gillian Polack’s students delight us all with possible tshirt slogans http://gillpolack.livejournal.com/546765.html

Where Danny Oz shares his thoughts on some original Dr Who episodes http://dalekboy.livejournal.com/290188.html

More to come!

Sep 15 2009

The good news – trilogy sold

Finally, I can scream and laugh and dance and sing in public about this (have been doing it a lot in private).

I’ve sold my fantasy romance trilogy, Balance of Power, to HarperCollins Australia. It will be published in Australia and New Zealand under the Voyager imprint, with the first book Love in Control to hit the shelves in July next year. Freedom to Be and Chance and Reward (books two and three) will be published in six monthly intervals from the first.

All this happened really, really quickly. I’ll go into some detail on what happened (and how I felt) in other posts, but in a nutshell, it went like this: I queried Stephanie Smith at HarperVoyager on Love in Control in April, she said she’d like to see the manuscript so I sent it to her in May. I saw Stephanie at Conjecture in Adelaide in June and she assured me she had the manuscript, but it would take her a while and I assured her I understood that publishing moves slowly. July 3, I get an email saying she loves it, and she wants to take it to acquisitions. I had to do a few things (synopsis for trilogy, bio), we had a chat on the phone to establish what would happen. On Tuesday July 14, the trilogy was taken to aquisitions and passed. On Friday August 7, the offer came through. Again, more to do on my part, this time getting ABNs and such organised, but I returned the signed offer on Friday September 4.

So much for publishing moving slowly. In just a few short weeks, I’ve gone from being a hard-working amateur to a professional writer, and in just a year from all this there will be a shiny book on shelves across Australia and New Zealand with my name on it.

As you can imagine, this has meant some major changes in my life. Since the trilogy passed aquisitions, I’ve been working two jobs – day job at the supermarket, writing when I can. Finances and things are needed to be reorganised to cope with the new tax regulations I have to work under. I had to pull out of the Aussiecon 4 committee, which was a shame as I was enjoying it but there’s only so many things one little person can do. As it is, the housework has been suffering, friends and family have been wondering where I am and I don’t think it’s any coincidence that I got so sick last week.

So, I’m guessing the main thing you’re all asking is – what is the trilogy about?

Well, it’s set in the modern world and features a race called the gadda – they descended from different ancestors to us humans and as a result, have access to the power and energy in the world and can use it to perform magic. Keeping their identity a secret is a big deal. Another big deal is the Forbidden Texts – teachings and ideas that have been locked away because of the danger they pose, not just to the person attempting to use them, but to the world as a whole.

The trilogy opens with the theft of the texts, and they need to be found and neutralised asap. The story of the struggle to do that is told over the three books in the form of three separate romances. In each book, the reader follows a new couple, whose growing relationship is at times eclipsed by the dangers of the texts. You get to see the same characters and follow the timeline, but in each book within two new POVs.

In book one, the couple is Maggie Shaunessy and Lucas Manly. Maggie grew up amongst humans, tried to disavow her gadda heritage and as a result is seen as a bit of a troublemaker. Lucas Manly also grew up amongst humans, but that’s because he thought he was human. Things are difficult enough between the two of them, and that’s before the Forbidden Texts start to make their presence felt and their futures are changed forever.

Book two is the story of Ione Hammond Gorton and Stephen O’Malley. Ione’s a single mum, and she’s got more than enough to deal with. When her uncle tries to set her up with the current wunderkind of the gadda, she isn’t impressed. Stephen, meanwhile, has spent his entire life focussed on one aim, and isn’t prepared for the way Ione turns everything upside-down. When Ione is poisoned with a concoction from the Forbidden Texts, they both find life heading in a direction that wasn’t anticipated.

Book three features Hampton O’Rourke and the lovely Mina Haraldson. Hampton is better known to the gadda as the Meganome, the protector of the gadda and the man responsible for finding and neutralising the Forbidden Texts. The search leads him to Mina, who’s descended from the mythical lost gadda – families who broke from society centuries earlier and were never found. Mina’s power has been awoken, and the results cost her dearly, so she’s quite anti-gadda, and not impressed to find the cute guy who comes into her store is the gadda of all gadda. Hampton should have more important things to think about – like finding the texts and saving the world - and yet…

So, there ‘tis. The short, sweet version of how my own text has changed my world forever. By far the best thing about this so far has been the reactions of friends and family about it. In some cases, they’ve been more excited than I have! Well, okay, it’s easy for them to get all excited – they aren’t the ones who have to get two (thankfully already drafted) books up to scratch and ready for publication in the space of a year, not to mention dealing with edits, publicity, and so on…

But yes, it is very, very exciting news. I’ll be working hard to hopefully ensure that this is just the beginning and I’ll be announcing book deals for many years to come.

Sep 09 2009

A big week on the PIR front

Yesterday, a petition of 4,000 signatures was presented to three Labor politicians by Saving Aussie Books member Sheryl Gwyther. Initially, it was going to be me doing the presentation later in the week, but then we found out that the Australian Publishers Association, the Australian Printers Union and the Australian Society of Authors were meeting with Kevin Rudd and Julia Gillard on Tuesday, so we brought it forward. This required a lot of re-organising, cause I was working Tuesday.

As a result, the dynamic Sheryl Gwyther sacrificed some frequent flyer points to come down from Brisbane to do the presentation. I picked her up from the airport and took her to Parliament House where I had to abandon her, due to poor health. We members of Saving Aussie Books waited for news of the presentation with baited breath, hoping it went well.

It did, and with more fan-fare than we expected. At the last moment, Aussie author Kate Grenville was able to come along as well, and a press conference was set up (the pictures made it all look very official) and Sheryl was quite fabulous, and has been getting a lot of well-deserved congratulations for her efforts.

However, not everyone has been happy with it. In a press release, the Coalition for Cheaper Books (Dymocks, Woolworths, Coles and Kmart) have attacked Sheryl for advertising on her website her book for sale with an online company that will sell it for thirteen percent below the RRP. Now, apart from the fact that this was one of those pop-up ads that Sheryl has no control over, why does it matter? The company involved, Fishpond, are a NZ based company that are able to sell Australian books cheaply because they don’t have to charge GST. And as an online bookseller, have less overheads than a store, so can afford cheaper prices in order to make profit.

In other words, this attempted attack on Sheryl takes us to the heart of the Coalition’s concerns – online businesses are taking away from their business, and they want to stop it.

And one can’t help thinking that the fact they would stoop to this level to attack one author from a group of authors smacks of desperation. Especially when it comes on the back of them saying the 4,000 signatures pale into insignificance next to the 18,000 signatures they put forward. Well, yes, if we had a company with branches all over Australia and a pool of tens of thousands of members of our rewards program, we’d probably have managed more than 4,000 signatures too. The fact that we sourced what we did, most of us being authors and mothers and several living in the country without the resources of being a national company, makes our 4,000 pretty bloody spectacular to my mind.

What I’d like Dymocks to tell us, apart from the 18,000 signatures, is how many people, like myself, dropped out of that rewards program and stopped shopping at Dymocks stores because of the position they’ve taken on PIR.

Needless to say, a few weeks ago Saving Aussie Books were wondering if we – including the APA, the APU and the ASA - would be able to fight the might of the Coalition. Now, we’re starting to feel confident that the Government will vote to not support the Productivity Commission’s recommendation, and things will remain as they are. And desperate moves like the attack on Sheryl only reinforce that belief.

I’ve been really proud to watch the women of Saving Aussie Books fight. They are a passionate and energetic lot, and I think the Coalition will rue the day they tried to take them on.

Sep 01 2009

Lessons learnt from Aida

Well, I’m back from yesterday’s sojourn to Sydney to see the opera (trust me to pick a year to do ballet and opera when they AREN’T in Canberra *sigh*). Anyhoo, the verdict – meh.

There were elements of the show that were stunning, and they were not so much to do with it being opera but more to do with it being directed by Graeme Murphy (who I have decided is a flat-out genius). The staging was remarkable – all angles to reflect the pyramids, I only got in Act Three that the pool of water along the front of the stage was the Nile and it wasn’t until it was over and my father-in-law commented that I realised the entire thing was reminiscent of the tomb at the end, showing that really the three characters were trapped from the very beginning and it was just a matter of the story playing itself out. Very cool. And also very slow of me, but then I am. The costuming was great, at times used to great dramatic effect, and the dancing was superb.

Operatically, I thought the two female leads were great, particularly from Act Two onwards when they got bitch fighting, and the choral scenes were everything I expected of opera – big and strong and beautiful.

But overall, I wasn’t convinced and didn’t come out of this buzzing the way I did out of the ballet earlier this year. After discussions with the in-laws (who came with me), I think this is down to a number of things. One – Aida isn’t the easiest opera to get into – there were only a couple of pieces of music that I recognised. Two – the surtitles were more a summing up of what the character was singing (in Italian) about, rather than a translation of every word which I can understand, since opera does tend to have a lot of ‘my love is at the door, he’s at the door, just there at the door, oh lovely door’ sort of stuff, but I think it also meant I missed some of the nuances of what was being said and therefore some of the subtleties and colours of the story. Three -  I don’t think the initial story was set up well enough to buy into the love of Aida and Ramades and thus get upset with the tragic end. Four – the male singers sucked. And no way was that short, fat man playing Ramades(a) ever going to be a match for a statuesque cutie like the singer who played Aida.

Now, for me as a writer, I don’t think suckage reasons one and four are things I can learn much from, but two and three have me thinking.

Not getting all the colours and subtleties really did affect my ability to connect with the characters, and it made me realise how important it is to thing about the details, and the little things, that tell you more about a character and their emotions. So sometimes, you might think that the little line a character sprouts in the middle of a scene or a little action as they are talking might not bring anything to the plot (hail, plot!) and thus not be necessary, but then it could well be those little things that make that character real and interesting and someone the reader connects to and thus wants to read (rule number two from Mr Vonnegut – Give the reader as least one character he or she can root for). And I’m thinking those times when it seemed a character jumped from one thought or decision to another without anything in between comes because some of the colour in earlier scenes was taken away, so I don’t know the character well enough.

As for reason three – I ended up comparing Aida to Romeo and Juliet (and particularly the Baz Lurhmann version) since the storylines are so similar – two star-crossed lovers, unable to be together, meet a tragic end. At the beginning of Aida, we are told that Ramades loves Aida – he goes on for ages about how she is the reason he gets up in the morning and he’s going to go and fight and crush and destroy her homeland for her love (weirdo). In this production, Graeme actually has Aida come onto the stage (they had these cool strips along the front to pull people onto and off the stage, so he stood on one and she floated out on the other). She stops behind him, grabs his hand, kisses it, leans into him, he stares at the audience and sings away. Then she disappears. Now, I think Murphy did that cause he had to do SOMETHING to have the two characters interact to show their love cause otherwise, the first time they have a decent conversation together is in Act Three. ACT THREE! Aida’s shown more passion with her rival, the Princess Armenis, than with her supposed love Ramedis. So no wonder I didn’t buy his sacrifice of death in order to protect her and their love, nor why she’d choose to die with him. Now, go to Romeo and Juliet – we see them meet, see them fall in love (ah, the fish tank scene), see them become entranced and then connected and then dedicated to each other, and so when the end comes we can see there is no other option for them to die, as it’s the only way they’ll ever really be together. And you cry. Well, I did.

So with Aida, I think we have a sterling example of why that old chestnut – show, don’t tell – is absolutely dead-set true. Even getting around the fact that there’s no way Aida would love a short, fat man like that(a), if we’d seen a scene showing us them together, in love, showing us their passion, we’d be able to buy into the tragedy of their end, instead of sitting there at the end, silently thinking “die, already!”

And there was one more thing – there was this cool thing in the middle of the opera, where the dancers were on the floor and it looked like they were being reflected in a mirror above them, and I was loving the affect, and then either the dancers or the film missed time and they fell out of sync and the trick revealed. I was soooo disappointed. I wondered how many other newbies like me were sitting there and how many of them fell out of love with opera at that moment. It made me realise that in terms of things like cons, or in writing, it’s easy to think about the people who are familiar with what you’re doing, but you also have to be aware that you could be dealing at some point with a newbie, and this might be the one chance that person gets to decide whether they want to keep going with you/con-going/the genre, and so you have to be excellent at all times cause you never know when that moment could be.

So, that’s it – the life and writing lessons from Aida. I’m not giving up on opera – I will try again. But it was a shame my first experience wasn’t as transformative as Swan Lake was in May.

(a) Yes, I know the irony of saying this in talking about an artform that had Luciano Pavarotti as its main star. But as my mother-in-law pointed out, you could have forgiven our boy lack of physical rightness for the role if he had a voice that transported you to the stars. Luciano had that voice and thus I think would have been fine in the role of Ramades (as he undoubtedly was in the other romantic roles he played in his career). This bloke didn’t.