Jul 26 2009

Truth IS stranger than fiction.

Hubby and I were watching a documentary on the moon last night, dealing first with the Apollo missions, and then with the new race to the moon, with a number of different commercial and non-government groups working to get there.

I was taken with the Moon Society, that had gotten to the stage of building a prototype moon base in the desert in Nevada or Utah or somewhere and were experimenting with suits and machinery and so on. Now, if only they had a rocket...

One group that did have a rocket was TransOrbital, who have gotten their hands on an ex-cold war nuclear missile. They are going to take out the nuclear material, remove the warhead and instead fill the cargo space with a commercial payload. People are paying $1000 a gram (I'm guessing that's US) to send their stuff up. There was a rocket shaped lipstick, some original artwork and cremated remains. These are put into a specially designed container and into the rocket. The rocket will then be fired at the moon and deliver the container ten metres below the lunar surface.

During the interview, the thought popped into my mind - um, there's no landing equipment on this missile. And I was right. "We're going to crash into the moon, and then the container will fire and deliver the payload ten metres below the lunar surface" the man from TransOrbital said cheerfully.

Crash into the moon, for the sole purpose of burying stuff like lipstick? I looked at my husband and said "If someone tried to write this as a story, they'd be told it's just not realistic."

But it is. In fact, the Trailblazer mission is due to be launched in October. Here's the link.

Crashing into the moon. *sigh*

Jul 25 2009

Nicole the clutz

There are truths about yourself that must be faced and accepted, no matter how much you wish them to be false. In my case, one of those truths is that I am a clutz. This is despite my deep desire to be graceful and coordinated and many attempts such as yoga, dance classes and so on to reverse this. I think these things negate a certain amount of the clutziness, but it can never be destroyed.

I am being reminded of this at the moment because I’m going through a particularly clutzy period. It seems that at least once an hour, I drop something or trip on something (that generally isn’t there) or something like that. However, in the past couple of days there’s been two sterling examples of my clutziness, they being:

a) I almost broke my thumb trying to turn on the bathroom light and:

b) I dropped a box of six two-litre cola bottles on my head.

I’m going to assume you’re interested in hearing the stories of the above and keep going :) So, Friday night after the fabulous Japanese dinner, I’ve gotten home and stepped into the hallway on my way to bed, only to stop when I realised that I hadn’t turned the light on and it was in fact too dark to see where I was going. “No problem,” says I to myself, “I’m standing near the bathroom, so I’ll turn on that light”. Now, important piece of info – bathroom light is on the hall-side of the door-frame. So I swing my hand up to reach for the light switch, thinking I was about 40 centimetres from the door, only to discover I’m in fact standing almost inside the doorframe and bang – my hand, with my thumb leading, slams into the wood just a few centimetres from where it began its ascent.

Cue much swearing. I was concerned that it would be too swollen the next day to go to work, but luckily it’s just got one of those bone-deep bruises that you don’t notice until you touch it, and that only happens when I get change out of the till drawer…

Anyway, so there I am at work, cursing my clutziness as I nurse my thumb through the day, and I go to tidy up the drinks aisle. Some clever chappy had decided, there not being enough room to put the excess boxes of cola bottles in the right place, to put them on top of the pile of mixed-can packs, at a height slightly above my eye level.

You can already see it coming, can’t you? Yes, I moved those boxes and yes, at one point, one slipped and landed on my cheek. Cue much swearing. But things like this are an occupational hazard at word, and so I shrugged it off and kept going, and it did stop hurting soon, so I thought nothing more of it.

Until I went for my tea break, looking in the mirror as I was washing my hands and thought “Hang on, I have a black eye. How did that happen?”

*sigh*

So yes, Nicole the clutz is in full swing at the moment. Luckily, when God realised he’d forgotten to program my brain for any form of co-ordination, he decided to balance things out by making me extremely pliable and bouncy, so I rarely get badly hurt from my escapades. So for example, when I slipped on the frozen peas that I dropped at work the other day (they double very nicely as ball-bearings), I landed with a thud but was able to (carefully) get up again and start cleaning up.

But feel for my poor husband, who as he stood in the kitchen yesterday and watched the cake-tin wobble around on the floor after I’d dropped it, looked at me and shook his head and said “You’re such a clutz.”

Yeah. I know.

Jul 22 2009

My response to the productivity commission

First, a recap for those who don’t know – late last year, the Australian Productivity Commission began an inquiry into parallel importation restrictions on Australian books. Currently, it stands that a book published in Australia under an Australian copyright is protected from competing in bookstores against the same book as published elsewhere in the world. However, if a book gets published overseas first, there’s just a few weeks window for the Australian version to come out, otherwise the restrictions are lifted and the overseas version can come in.

A group called the Coalition for Cheaper Books, made up of Australia’s largest book retailer Dymocks and some major companies such as Woolworths put forward the contention that these restrictions on importation were inflating Australian book prices, and that this was uncompetitive. Hence the inquiry.

It is true that Australian books are more expensive compared to books published in places like America and England, particularly in areas such as educational texts. However, it is also true that the Australian market is smaller than these places, so the ability to sell books cheaper is hampered by lack of demand. Please note that the Australian Association of Booksellers does not agree with Dymocks. And has been pointed out recently, if the Government is concerned about book prices, they can drop the GST on books – bang, down go prices.

It is also true that the Australian publishing industry is well-regarded and respected around the world. It’s one of the most profitable publishing industries that exists, and it’s achieved this by a) championing Australian writers and b) with virtually no government support or subsidies.

I saw the problems in this, and so I put in a submission to the inquiry, along with dozens of other writers, publishers, booksellers and so on.  The first potential recommendation was that Australian copyright only exist for twelve months. Both sides of the argument were unhappy with this response – it was a case of trying to have a foot in both camps.

So last week the final recommendation was released and in a nutshell, it was that the restrictions be abolished and booksellers can get their books from wherever they want to.

This would be disastrous for the Australian publishing industry, for Australian writers and readers. As someone who dreams of having a publishing contract, and who is submitting my novel to Australian publishers right now, the thought that this could happen terrifies me. So I’m sending a letter to politicians – my local pollies, the Prime Minister and Arts Minister, politicians I knew during my years as a journalist.

I’ve copied the main portion of the text below – I’m personalising the first paragraph for the various people I’m writing to. If you like what I’m saying, feel free to steal parts of the letter for your own.

The Federal Government is still to decide what to do. There is still the chance to make them see the damage this would do and to ignore the recommendation. I hope you’ll join with me.

“I am hoping to follow the footsteps of many friends and writers I admire – people who started their career here in Australia, were able on the strength of their writing and the sales to then sell that book overseas. People whose career and whose art was nurtured by the presence of a strong and vital Australian publishing industry. They were able to dip their toes in the water in the country of their birth, in a culture of their understanding; growing and developing before they had to compete against the huge numbers in the rest of the world.

But this is a path that it would seem is going to come to an end, if the recommendations of the Productivity Commission are enacted. Why will Australian publishers spend their time and energy on publishing Australian authors, when they will have to compete against the very same books coming in from overseas? How will Australian authors get the experience and support they need to match it against the multitude of expectant authors overseas?

It’s true that lifting the restrictions may well see the price of books lowering, but they won’t be Australian books. Even if they are written by Australian authors, if they are edited and published overseas, they will be skewed towards those markets, not our own. Many of my published friends talk about the intrusive editing from overseas, particularly from America, and that their books change substantially. It’s not just about changing words such as footpath to pavement – it’s about changing the sensibility and ideology to match that of another country and another culture.

And then take in consideration the size of the industries overseas – here in Australia, you are competing against just dozens, maybe hundreds of other authors for the possibility of publication. Overseas, you are one person against thousands, all aiming for the few spots each month that publishers can provide.

There are many incredibly talented writers here in Australia who are working extremely hard to hone their craft, to write and edit and revise in the hope of writing the book that catches an editor’s attention and gets a contract. Those people will, under this recommendation, lose an important avenue to publication. Those people will have to write books as Americans or as the British, not as Australians in order to get published.

And the losers will be the book-buying public. The Australian Publishing industry has grown mostly on the success of local authors. Australian readers love to read Australian books, and without parallel importation restrictions and Australian rights, there won’t be as many of them.

Even if this proposal does cause the lowering of prices for the book-buying public, it is relying on big business to pass on those savings. Knowing that Coles and Woolworths are involved, and knowing what they are doing with grocery prices and fuel, I cannot help but laugh at this very naïve assumption.

The book-buying public already has access to cheap books, through the internet and through remaindering. But the Coalition for Cheaper Books doesn’t mention or support this and why? Because that money isn’t coming to them.

The recommendation from the Productivity Commission will, in my mind, not achieve the intended result of substantially lowering book prices and will cause a downturn in Australian publishing, and in the quality and quantity of Australian books being published.

I ask that you not agree to the recommendation and that you keep the current parallel importation restrictions in place.”

Nicole R Murphy

Jul 20 2009

The new writing plan

For reasons that even I can’t adequately explain at present, I have changed my writing focus. The novel I was working on, Battle for Odana, has been put aside because I can’t stop thinking about my fantasy romance trilogy Balance of Power. Book one, Love in Control, is currently trawling the publishers, looking for some fertile soil within which to be planted and bloom. After some recent feedback, I  had another look at it and damn if a) I didn’t still like it and b) it kicked off a desire to get books two and three (currently in a draft form) up to scratch.

So I opened up book two, only to discover that I had actually started working on it last year, but had stopped when I got to the point where I realised changes were afoot and I wasn’t sure where it was going to go. Thanks to my recent re-love of the series, however, I now do know where it’s going, and I can write it.

I’ve decided to combine this with a new approach I want to take to my writing – setting myself smaller targets. I work well on deadlines – it’s the journalist in me. I’ve always naturally set myself deadlines, but they’ve been rather fluid and loose and long-term eg I want to have this draft/rewrite finished by the end of *month* but really, the world won’t end if I don’t reach it. However, I want to be more professional about this, and so I’m going to do something different.

I’m not just setting fluid monthly targets, I’m going to set definite weekly targets. And the target at the moment – 10,000 words a week. People who have written with me (Hi FWOR!) will know that this is eminently doable for me, especially since the hours at work are starting to settle down again – I can do 10,000 words in a day if I want to. The strength I see in this is that if I get ahead, then I get to have time off, but it’s not an onerous task to do 10,000 words a week and so the risk of falling behind is minimal.

With book two, that will get me to my target of 110,000 words well before the end of August, my self-imposed deadline to have this re-write completed.

So, having said that, I’m off to re-immerse myself in the story of Ione and Stephen and the increased threat to every living creature on Earth :)

 

Jul 19 2009

Welcome to the new blog

Because you can’t have too many blogs :)

I’ve been blogging for several years on LiveJournal, but now I’m setting up my professional web-presence. This is where I will be blogging from now on.

You can also find me on Twitter and Facebook. Just look for Nicole R Murphy. I tend to be more into Twitter than Facebook.